Nov 03, · Further discussion of Bubba the Love Sponge’s appearance on Tuesday led to a reminiscing session of Wednesday of Bubba’s elaborate wedding —specifically the wild antics of Ronnie “the Limo Driver” Mund. Remembering the raunchy speech that featured on-air drops like “69!” that are used to this day, the Stern Show staffer offered some background Oct 28, · Tags biden, chants, interrupt, speech, trump Post navigation Chicago is not happy with Mayor Lightfoot 6 Charts That Show the Coming Economic Implosion and How To Take Cover Oct 27, · Joe Biden appeared with Terry McAuliffe to help the Virginia gubernatorial candidate make it across the finish line to win the election. When Biden began to speak, a crowd yelled, “We love Trump!” over and over. Watch as Biden hears the chants and tries to hide his alarm by grinning. It’s a Biden tactic when he’s confronted. He grins
Ronnie ‘the Limo Driver’ Mund Recalls Wild Speech at Bubba the Love Sponge’s Wedding | Howard Stern
Freedom of speech [2] is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorshipor legal sanction. The right to freedom of expression has been recognized as a human right in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international human rights law by the United Nations.
A lot of countries have constitutional law that protects free speech. Terms like free speechfreedom of speech, and freedom of expression are used interchangeably in political discourse. However, in legal sense, the freedom of expression includes any activity of seeking, receiving, and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. Article 19 of the UDHR states that "everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form speech on love art, or through any other media of his choice.
Freedom of speech and expression, therefore, may not be recognized as being absolute, and common limitations or boundaries to freedom of speech relate to libelslanderobscenitypornographyspeech on love, seditionincitementfighting wordsclassified speech on lovecopyright violationtrade secretsfood labelingnon-disclosure agreementsspeech on love, the right to privacydignitythe right to be forgottenpublic securityand perjury.
Justifications for such include the harm principleproposed by John Stuart Mill in On Libertyspeech on love, which suggests that speech on love only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. The idea of the "offense principle" is also used in the justification of speech limitations, describing the restriction on forms of expression deemed offensive to society, considering factors such as extent, duration, motives of the speaker, and ease with which it could be avoided.
Freedom of speech and expression has a long history that predates modern international human rights instruments, speech on love.
Freedom of speech was vindicated by Erasmus and Milton. One of the world's first freedom of the press acts was introduced in Sweden inmainly due to the classical liberal member of parliament and Ostrobothnian priest Anders Chydenius.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizenadopted during the French Revolution inspecifically affirmed freedom of speech as an inalienable right. The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man.
Every citizen may, speech on love, accordingly, speak, write, and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law. Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rightsadopted instates that:. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers, speech on love.
Today, freedom of speech, speech on love the freedom of expression, is recognised in international and regional human rights law. The right is enshrined in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsArticle 10 of the European Convention on Human RightsArticle 13 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
International, regional and national standards also recognise that freedom of speech, as the freedom of expression, includes any medium, whether it be orally, in written, in print, through the Internet or through art forms, speech on love.
This means that the protection of freedom of speech as a right includes not only the content, but also the means of expression, speech on love. The right to freedom of speech and expression is closely related to other rights, and may be limited when conflicting with other rights see limitations on freedom of speech.
However greater latitude is given when criticism of public figures is involved, speech on love. The right to freedom of expression is particularly important for mediawhich plays a special role as the bearer of the general right to freedom of expression for all. Judith Lichtenberg has outlined conditions in which freedom of the press may constrain freedom of speech, for example, if all the people who control the various mediums of publication suppress information or stifle the diversity of voices inherent in freedom of speech.
This limitation was famously summarized as "Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one". Freedom of speech is usually seen as a negative right. Freedom of speech on love is understood to be fundamental in a democracy. The norms on limiting freedom of expression mean that public debate may not be completely suppressed even in times of emergency.
He has argued that the concept of democracy is that of self-government by the people. For such a system to work, an informed electorate is necessary. In order to be appropriately knowledgeable, there must be no constraints on speech on love free flow of information and ideas. According to Meiklejohn, democracy will not be true to its essential ideal if those in power are able to manipulate the electorate by withholding information and stifling criticism.
Meiklejohn acknowledges that the desire to manipulate opinion can stem from the motive of seeking to benefit society. However, he argues, choosing manipulation negates, in its means, the democratic ideal. Eric Barendt has called speech on love defence of free speech on the grounds of democracy "probably the most attractive and certainly the most fashionable free speech theory in modern Western democracies.
Emerson expanded on this defence when he argued that freedom of speech helps to provide a balance between stability and change. Freedom of speech acts as a "safety valve" to let off steam when people might otherwise be bent on revolution, speech on love. He argues that "The principle of open discussion is a method of achieving a more adaptable and at the same time more stable community, of maintaining the precarious balance between speech on love cleavage and necessary consensus.
Research undertaken by the Worldwide Governance Indicators project at the World Bankindicates that freedom of speech, and the process of accountability that follows it, have a significant impact in the quality of governance of a country. Richard Moon has developed the argument that the value of freedom of speech and freedom of expression lies with social interactions. Moon writes that "by communicating an individual forms relationships and associations with others — family, friends, co-workers, church congregation, and countrymen.
By entering into discussion with others an individual participates in the development of knowledge and in the direction of the community. Freedom of speech is not regarded as absolute by some with most legal systems generally setting limits on the freedom of speech, particularly when freedom of speech conflicts with other rights and protections, such as in the speech on love of libelslanderspeech on love, pornographyobscenityfighting wordsand intellectual property. Some limitations to freedom speech on love speech may occur through legal sanction, and others may occur through social disapprobation.
Some views are illegal to express because it can cause harm to others. This category often includes speech that is both false and dangerous, such as falsely shouting "Fire! Justifications for limitations to freedom of speech often reference the " harm principle " or the "offence principle.
In On LibertyJohn Stuart Mill argued that " there ought to exist the fullest liberty of professing and discussing, as a matter of ethical conviction, any doctrine, however immoral it may be considered, speech on love. InJoel Feinberg introduced what is known as the "offence principle". Feinberg wrote, "It is always a good reason in support of a proposed criminal prohibition that speech on love would probably be an effective way of preventing serious offence as opposed to injury or harm to persons other than the actor, and that it is probably a necessary means to that end.
But, as offending someone is less serious than harming someone, the penalties imposed should be higher for causing harm. Jasper Doomen argued that harm should be defined from the point of view of the individual citizen, not limiting harm to physical harm since nonphysical harm may also be involved; Feinberg's distinction between harm and offence is criticized as largely trivial.
InBernard Harcourt wrote speech on love the collapse of the harm principle: "Today the debate is characterized by a cacophony of competing harm arguments without any way to resolve them. There is no longer an argument within the structure of the debate to resolve the speech on love claims of harm.
The original harm principle was never equipped to determine the relative importance of harms. Interpretations of both the harm and offense limitations to freedom of speech are culturally and politically relative. For instance, in Russia, the harm and offense principles have been used to justify the Russian LGBT propaganda law restricting speech and action in relation to LGBT issues.
A number of European countries that take pride in freedom of speech nevertheless outlaw speech that might be interpreted as Holocaust denial. These include Austria, speech on love, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, speech on love, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, speech on love, Switzerland and Romania. In some countries, blasphemy is a crime.
For example, in Austria, defaming Muhammadthe prophet of Islam, is not protected as free speech. Certain public institutions may also enact policies restricting the freedom of speech, for example speech codes at state-operated schools. In the U. Ohio[42] expressly overruling Whitney v. Supreme Court referred to the right even to speak openly of violent action and revolution in broad terms:. The opinion in Brandenburg discarded the previous test of "clear and present danger" and made the right to freedom of political speech protections in the United States almost absolute, speech on love.
City of St. Paulin which the Supreme Court ruled that hate speech is permissible, except in the case of imminent violence. Limitations speech on love on time, place, and manner apply to all speech, regardless of the view expressed.
For example, a time, place, and manner restriction might prohibit a noisy political demonstration at a politician's home during the middle of the night, as that impinges upon the rights of the politician's neighbors to quiet enjoyment of their own homes. An otherwise identical activity might be permitted if it happened at a different time e. Jo Glanville, speech on love, editor of the Index on Censorshipstates that "the Internet has been a revolution for censorship as much as for free speech".
Inin the landmark cyberlaw case of Reno v. ACLUthe US Supreme Court partially overturned the law. Dalzellone of the three federal judges who in June declared parts of the CDA unconstitutional, in his opinion speech on love the following: [52].
The Internet is a far more speech-enhancing medium than printthe village greenspeech on love the mails. Because it would necessarily affect the Internet itself, the CDA would necessarily reduce the speech available for adults on the medium. This is a constitutionally intolerable result. Some of the dialogue on the Internet surely tests the limits of conventional discourse.
Speech on the Internet can be unfiltered, unpolished, and unconventional, even emotionally charged, sexually explicit, and vulgar speech on love in a word, "indecent" in many communities. But we should expect such speech to occur in a medium in which citizens from all walks of life have a voice.
We should also protect the autonomy that such a medium speech on love to ordinary people as well as media magnates. The Government can speech on love to protect children from pornography on the Internet through vigorous enforcement of existing laws criminalising obscenity and child pornography. In my view, our action today should only mean that Government's permissible supervision of Internet contents stops at the traditional line of unprotected speech.
The strength of the Internet is chaos. The World Summit on the Information Society WSIS Declaration of Principles adopted in makes specific reference to the importance of the right to freedom of expression for the " Information Society " in stating:. We reaffirm, as an essential foundation of the Information society, and as outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; that this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Communication is a speech on love social process, a basic human need and the foundation of all social organisation. It is central to the Information Society. Everyone, everywhere should have the opportunity to participate and no one should be excluded from the benefits of the Information Society offers. According to Bernt Hugenholtz and Lucie Guibault, the public domain is under pressure from the " commodification of information" as information with previously little or no economic value has acquired independent economic value in the information age.
This includes factual data, personal datagenetic information and pure ideas. The commodification of information is taking place through intellectual property law, contract lawas well as broadcasting and telecommunications law. Freedom of information is an extension of freedom of speech where the medium of expression is the Internet. Freedom of information may also refer to the right to privacy speech on love the context of the Internet and information technology.
As with the right to freedom of expression, the right to privacy is a recognised human right and freedom of information acts as an extension to this right. the ability to access Web contentwithout censorship or restrictions.
LOVE YOURSELF When People DISRESPECT YOU: Part 3: BK Shivani at Novato, California (English)
, time: 27:04Buster Posey's emotional retirement speech shows why Giants fans love him | RSN
Nov 01, · Reserved Posey shows why fans love him in retirement speech / by Dalton Johnson Giants When Buster Posey sat down at the podium Thursday in his blue suit, he began his retirement speech by thanking the woman sitting to the right of him. The usually reserved Giants legend found himself getting emotional when speaking about his wife, Kristen, who Jul 20, · I love you, little brother. Congratulations to both of you. I wish you a lifetime of love and happiness together. Let's toast the newlyweds!" Heartfelt Best Man Speech Example "In preparation for this day, I Googled 'heartfelt best man speech' and I found a website with thousands of different speech examples that I could pay to see Nov 03, · Further discussion of Bubba the Love Sponge’s appearance on Tuesday led to a reminiscing session of Wednesday of Bubba’s elaborate wedding —specifically the wild antics of Ronnie “the Limo Driver” Mund. Remembering the raunchy speech that featured on-air drops like “69!” that are used to this day, the Stern Show staffer offered some background
No comments:
Post a Comment